Cobb transit analysis an exercise in futility in informing voters
by Don McKee
June 20, 2012 01:03 AM | 813 views | 11 11 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
The latest twist in “As the TSPLOST Turns” is news that the long-awaited alternatives analysis study of mass transit in Cobb will be ready by September – only a month or so after the July 31 regional transportation sales tax (TSPLOST) referendum. Hooray?

This $1.8 million analysis by Croy Engineering will recommend what the firm believes is the best mode of mass transportation for Cobb, the best route for it and a 20-year financial plan to pay for it, as the Journal’s Geoff Folsom reported last week.

Here’s the kicker: According to Faye DiMassimo, the county DOT director, Croy was not requested to complete the study before the referendum because “It couldn’t be done by July 31.” Moreover, she said the analysis project started before the Transportation Investment Act was passed and “was never on a schedule that worked with” the TIA schedule.

So it’s an exercise in futility so far as informing Cobb voters about what an engineering firm thinks is the best mode and route for mass transit. And it’s virtually irrelevant anyway, according to Cobb Commission Chairman Tim Lee. He said the planned $695 million premium bus service from Acworth to the MARTA Arts Center Station “makes sense on its own.”

If the TSPLOST passes, Lee hopes the analysis will “help fine-tune what’s best for the northwest corridor” – whatever that means. So what if the much touted analysis recommends light rail instead of the premium bus service? Lee said he and his fellow commissioners will make the decision on how to proceed – which means they could decide on light rail if that is the recommended alternative, right?

Even if the Cobb commission decides against the AA recommendation, the project has to pass muster with the Atlanta Regional Commission. If federal funds are involved, as the MDJ reported, the preferred alternative would have to fit into the ARC’s Regional Transportation Plan.

Meanwhile, there’s opposition to the TSPLOST from across the political spectrum, ranging from the Georgia chapter of the Sierra Club to the Tea Party of Georgia. The Sierra Club has recommended a “no” vote in all 12 state regions holding TSPLOST referendums on July 31.

Contrasting the widespread feeling in Cobb that more traffic lanes and improvements are needed, the Sierra Club “concluded that the project list is too heavily focused on sprawl-inducing road expansion and will have a negative overall impact from an environmental perspective.” The club also warns that the TIA “likely kills commuter rail for another decade” and says the “transit component has too many flaws, including vaguely defined project descriptions, under-funded capital expansions and uncertainty about long-term operational support.” No argument with that.

Further, purely local projects will soak up 15 percent of the estimated $6.1 billion raised by the tax. That’s about $1 billion for everything from sidewalks to parks and other projects that have nothing to do with relieving traffic congestion.

Solution: Vote no July 31 and start over on a real transportation improvement plan.

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Traffic/development
|
June 25, 2012
Everyone either says it's about development, or traffic relief? WHY CAN'T IT BE ABOUT BOTH!! We need traffic relief now, but also, as new people move to our region, we need new ways for people to live so we don't cause EVEN MORE congestion. There needs to be transit along the I-75 corridor. And for all who call it a boondogle, overtime, it will pay for its construction and operations cost. Of course it has to be subsidized, but it still will collect user fees from an estimated 50,000 daily riders. That's 1/7 Cobb Commuters off the road. And remember, roads are COMPLETLEY SUBSIDIZED. They are built and maintained with ONLY TAXPAYER MONEY. And chill out about extra funds going to the light rail. The T-SPLOST would cover most of it and any additional funds would be from Federal Transit Grants.
KellyWoods
|
June 20, 2012
Additional sources of mobility options are needed for Atlanta and the Metro Atlanta area which includes Cobb County. Along with highway improvements that the passage of the Regional Transportation will bring it will drastically improve traffic congestion in Atlanta.
ARC says Not So
|
June 21, 2012
Recent ARC official statements have backed off their early congestion improvement claims. The new tax is now a "development" tool.
Too Honest
|
June 20, 2012
Croy Engineering paid $1.8 million for a study that does not matter. I really wish somebody would pay me $1.8 million for something that does not matter.
No Lee Train
|
June 20, 2012
So it's out of the bag! The Board of Commissioners WILL make the decision on the train.

Vote for anyone but Lee. Choose commissioners who will save us from the train. If Atlanta out votes Cobb on TSPLOST, some kind of transit will be forced down our throats. Better elect Commissioners that will keep the train out and approve a more cost effective express bus.
anonymous
|
June 21, 2012
Can we just wait and see what the study says. If it says no one will ride the buses, and they take longer, yet the trains are quicker, and will attract more riders then I'm all for it. And go research the number i posted about ridership. They're directly out of a light rail study along the corridor a couple years ago. And I promise you that light rail and express bus will have the same cost effectiveness. Because rail always draws more economic development and riders than buses. And "ARC says no" the vast majority of leaders at the ARC support the T-SPLOST, and the traffic relief numbers being shown by Unite Atlanta are very impressive. And one last note about being cost affective, Transit isn't designed to make a profit. It's an investment of tax payer money, than has many benefits, and covers some of its cost but not all.
Last GA Democrat
|
June 20, 2012
It doesn't matter what the Alternatives Analysis study says because they're NOT going have to have anymore of our money to waste on the light rail transit boondoogle after the T-SPLOST is defeated at the polls on July 31st anyway.
andy callaway
|
June 20, 2012
please explain how a rail line, having an estimated daily ridership of 50,000, connecting KSU, Town Center, the Cumberland/Galleria Area, and Cobb residents to job and activity centers all over the region including downtown, midtown, and the airport is a boondoggle. Ever think of the benefits?
Cost Andy
|
June 21, 2012
Andy, it's the unit cost. Dollars per passenger car that train will remove from the congested roads. And the new sales tax in 10 years that will be needed for operation and maintenance (see MARTA). The train is not cost effective.
We need transit!
|
June 21, 2012
No transit is "cost effective" if you look purely at the cost of ridership vs. expense of operations. That's not the point. The point is there is an obvious need for public transportation options.

Building roads is even less "cost effective" operations and maintenance in addition to additional cost don't offer any way to pay for themselves other than taxes, idk why people insist that transit should be forced to function differently.

Major cities have/need solid public transportation. In Atlanta we don't have that b/c the short sighted voters in Cobb and Gwinnett voted down MARTA twice over the past 30 years. Without public transit we will fall behind other upcoming cities like Charlette and Birmingham over the next 30 years. There is no quick fix to transportation problems, planning and funding need to line up to make it happen. Vote Yes on T-SPLOST as it's a start in the right direction.
Last GA Democrat
|
June 22, 2012
It is such a LAME argument to place the blame on MARTA being the way it is because Cobb and Gwinnett (rightfully and understandably voted it down over 20 years ago).

Cobb and Gwinnett, who by the way have no control or say over MARTA's management and operations, had nothing to do with MARTA running itself almost completely into the ground as a result of self-mismanagement and incompetence.

Cobb and Gwinnett didn't misuse company credit cards, Cobb and Gwinnett didn't refuse to raise their fares with inflation and prevent more of the cost of operating and maintaining the service being self-funded by users.

How can MARTA be expected to even reasonably serve Cobb and Gwinnett when it can't even dependably serve Fulton and DeKalb who fund it operation with a one-percent sales tax?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides