|July 17, 2013||Hell just froze over!||1 comments|
|July 11, 2013||Sick gun fantasies realized||12 comments|
|July 02, 2013||July 4 reality check||1 comments|
|June 25, 2013||Gandolfini: big man, big heart||1 comments|
|June 13, 2013||Make up your mind||3 comments|
|June 04, 2013||Right call on terror||13 comments|
|May 22, 2013||Party of stupid||14 comments|
|May 16, 2013||Scandal going nowhere||6 comments|
|May 06, 2013||Iraq, now Syria?||19 comments|
|April 30, 2013||Lil’ Limbaugh sobers up||6 comments|
After years of dismissing global warming - or "climate change," the euphemism that seems acceptable to conservatives -
Fox News did the unthinkable last week. It actually reported on the consequences of human-created green house gases.
The science behind climate change, like the science behind the theory of evolution, is pretty much conclusive. Still, right wingers like to pretend there is some big debate raging in the scientific community over global warming.
There is no debate.
Some 97 percent of all scientific papers that take a stand on the issue agree global warming is happening and we're seeing more and more of it's effects around the world. Likewise, 97 percent of all climatologists agree global warming is caused by human activity.
Of course, the conservative media dolts in the pay of the carbon-producing industries run by people like the Koch brothers always like to point at record cold snaps in an attempt to discredit global warming, ignoring the fact that these weather events along with drought, wildfires and flooding are actually part of the growing problem as scientists predicted.
On Monday the high was 95 degrees in New York City and 73 degrees in Dallas, Texas, just one example of disrupted weather patterns scientists say is caused by global warming.
So it was astounding that Fox News cited the Department of Energy in a report that warned "power disruptions that were caused by Superstorm Sandy" will become more frequent as global warming worsens.
Maybe now that the preferred source of information for conservatives is finally getting around to acknowledging what most all right-minded thinkers have known for years Fox News will stop mocking the irrefutable science and start getting serious about learning what global warming is doing to the planet.
As if we didn’t already have enough gun violence in America, along comes Zombie Industries with a series of shooting targets, dummies made up to look like those who support gun safety laws, one of which is the president of the United States.
Everything wrong with the gun industry and its allies can be summed up in what Zombie Industries is selling.
We already know the gun industry and its front group, the National Rifle Association, are completely irresponsible, refusing to consider even modest proposals to curb gun violence including universal background checks, something the NRA supported a decade ago. Zombie Industries squares the circle.
So, for $89.95, you can buy “Al” a human torso dummy that resembles Al Sharpton. When shot, the life-size dummy “bleeds.”
The company offers a disclaimer saying the dummy “represents fictitious characters” then tells the dummy’s back story this way: “Poor Al he was a Sharp guy…”
Sharpton, an African-American ordained minister who hosts MSNBC’s popular “Politics Nation” has been an outspoken supporter for sensible gun safety laws. He called out Zombie Industries on his show after the company exhibited a dummy in the likeness of President Obama at the NRA’s national convention.
We haven’t had enough gun violence directed at presidents?
Another dummy target, presented as a “gun control lobbyist, the most dangerous zombie in the USA today,” no doubt thrilled the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre.
This isn’t funny. This isn’t good clean fun. It represents the basest, most disgusting underbelly of America’s gun culture, appealing to the sick fantasies of some who would love to turn their weapons on anyone who knows gun safety legislation saves lives.
Opinions diverge at this point as to what precisely that means.
To the Founding Fathers and the other landed, white men they represented, it meant becoming a new aristocracy akin to the old one in England, where moneyed gentry protected by royalty lorded over the common folk.
When freedom was won, the new American aristocrats consolidated power. Women, minorities, the poor and others not part of the new “aristocratic” class were deliberately excluded.
“All men are created equal” meant just that: white men of wealth were equal. They modeled Congress on the Parliament in Britain, with the aristocracy in the upper chamber, and even considered at one point crowning George Washington king.
In the century and a quarter that followed, America’s faux aristocrats pretty much had free rein to do as they pleased and the results weren’t pretty.
This is where the self-government part comes in. We the people came to understand the guiding principles of our Declaration and Constitution, intentionally or not, applied to everyone, not just the wannabe aristocrats.
America is far different today than it was in 1787. Most notably, every American enjoys the same rights but we must vigilantly safeguard them. The self-interest of modern day aristocrats is almost always at odds with the rights of everyone else.
The old robber baron aristocrats believed they had the right to clear cut entire forests, dump their factory and mill waste into rivers, and let the smoke from their furnaces blacken the skies. How this harmed others didn’t matter.
It became necessary for we the people, exercising self-government, to correct this inequity with new laws and the formation of the Environmental Protection Agency to enforce them. Not surprisingly, modern aristocrats want the EPA abolished.
Similarly, other aristocrats thought they had the right to put small children paid pennies to work in mines and factories for excruciatingly long hours. It never occurred to these self-interested white men that what they were doing was immoral.
The parents of those children likewise endured endless hours of toil in unsafe conditions at whatever pay the aristocrat decided he wanted to give them. Starvation was the alternative. This was exactly the way things were in England, after all.
We the people recognized the inequality and made laws curtailing these exploitative practices putting in place the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to enforce them. OSHA is nonetheless reviled by modern aristocrats.A conservative MDJ writer suggested the other day that the EPA, OSHA and other federal agencies are ruled by despots ignoring the “letter and spirit of the Declaration and the Constitution” as if these agencies weren’t lawfully founded by the people to protect the rights of everyone; as if these agencies are not accountable to the people through Congress.
Change is inevitable. Change is constant. But I’m always amazed by educated people who fail to evolve their thinking and accept that change is a permanent part of our existence. The good old days, conservative types maintain, were the best days despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
These same conservatives consider anything new and different as evil and misguided. Look no further than their pathological hatred of the first African-American president as proof positive.
We the people have much to be grateful for. And what makes America great, what makes the American people great, thankfully, is the majority’s willingness to evolve despite the conservative minority always screaming “stop!”
Happy Fourth of July.
As Tony Soprano, the amoral, overbearing New Jersey mob boss with issues, James Gandolfini demonstrated his enormous acting talent, ranging from ruthless killer to shivering bowl of emotional Jell-O, sometimes in one episode.
Tony could be a charming dining companion one minute and viciously beat some poor mook with a pool cue the next, his family of hit men, thieves and miscreants living in abject terror and undying love of their capo de capo.
"This is the man I'm going to hell for," muttered Christopher Moltisanti, played by Michael Imperiale, one of The Soprano's outstanding cast members.
Over the last decade, the New Jersey born and bred Jim Gandolfini enjoyed tremendous success on the stage and screen in addition to television. He was nominated for a Tony Award for his role in the Broadway comedy "God of Carnage" and played Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in last year's Oscar-nominated film, "Zero Dark Thirty."
So his death last week at age 51 while vacationing in Italy came as a shock, for Gandolfini seemed to be just hitting his stride.
One project that did not receive as much public notice as it should have was Gandolfini's documentary, "Alive Day Memories, Home From Iraq," in which the actor interviewed American servicemen and women wounded in battle about their injuries, their mental health and their hopes and dreams. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8j08fvUk67U
Aired on HBO, "Alive Day" is a startling, sometimes shocking look at what our wounded warriors endured and what they are enduring as they re-enter civilian life. Some are missing limbs while others suffer post traumatic stress disorder. All of these young men and women volunteered to serve and deserve whatever it takes to help them assimilate and thrive in their post-war lives, which is the point of Gandolfini's film.
His friends and family remember Jim Gandolfini as a quiet, shy and generous man who, unlike a lot of stars, used his international celebrity for the greater good.
In expressing their wonderment, however, what conservatives actually reveal is their abject ignorance. It's another shining example of the epistemic closure I wrote about recently, in which right wingers live in their own information bubble stuffed with incorrect assumptions, falsehoods, distortions and lies.
They conclude that, because the Times isn't, say, Fox News, where virtually all coverage is tilted heavily to the right, it can't possibly be "objective".
I doubt few Cobb County conservatives bother reading the New York Times, so I can attest as a regular reader that Obama and his policies are routinely castigated or questioned by the Times' editorial and op-ed writers as well as in its White House coverage. Yet local conservatives are convinced - possibly because the newspaper is based in the Northeast - that the New York Times, one of the America's newspapers of record, is an unapologetic liberal rag that rolls over for Obama.
Realty check, please.
In the wake of 9-11, President Bush rushed to seize power, capitalizing on the fear and trepidation many of us felt after we watched the Twin Towers fall. The debate at the time, to the extent there was one at all, was that new, high tech tools were needed to fight international terrorism and we must unleash these against America's enemies.
We - you and me, friend - timidly allowed our elected representatives to ram through legislation like the Patriot Act that gives government busy bodies more, not less, power to intrude into our lives.
Now we're shocked these programs under Obama continue to cast a wide net, pulling in telephone and Internet communications records that can be used to zero in on, so we are told, suspicious traffic that could be terrorists...or might be just you or me chatting politics with friends, or visiting anti-government web sites, or reading about armed insurgencies.
Here's the thing: You allowed this to happen. So did I. As the comic strip character Pogo famously said, "We have met the enemy and he is us."
Do you want your security or do you want your freedom? Make up your mind.
To his everlasting discredit, Lyndon Johnson ginned up the rationale for all out war in Vietnam with his bogus Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Realizing what he'd done not long afterwards, to his everlasting credit, Johnson refused to run for a second term.
George W. Bush didn't have Johnson's courage or capacity for shame, otherwise he too would have declined to run for a second term after his bald-faced WMD lie was exposed.
None of this has stopped right wing commentators, many of whom assiduously avoided military service, from pushing their "Obama is surrendering the war on terror" B.S. It should be noted that many of these are the same people who were dead wrong when they were screaming for a war with Iraq 10 years ago.
As Gen. George Patton said of the Saturday Evening Post's editors, "(They) don't know any more about real fighting under fire than they know about (sexual intercourse)."
Unlike Vietnam, there was no conscription during the war on terror. If we had a draft, there would have never been an unprovoked invasion of Iraq without irrefutable evidence that Saddam had WMD. And there would have been a lot of hard thinking before U.S. boots were put on the ground in Afghanistan, history's cesspool.
Bush, who turned down a Vietnam tour, would never permit his wealthy friends to send their sons or daughters to Iraq.
I guarantee you, the College Republicans and Bush's Skull and Bones at Yale would have been the first guys protesting in the streets in 2003 if they had actually been compelled to go fight and perhaps die in Baghdad or Kabul.
I was in high school during Vietnam. My recollection is that protesters like the ones at the University of Wisconsin didn't want to be forced to put their lives on the line in a pointless conflict with no exit strategy. Nevertheless, Richard Nixon escalated the war when he took office in 1968 even though, by then, anybody with a brain knew Vietnam was a lost cause.
With neocon and right wing media chicken hawks cheering him on, Bush's response to a horrifying terrorist attack was to unleash America's military might on a relatively small number of stateless terrorists holed up in Afghanistan and Pakistan. It was like using an nuclear bomb to kill flies; no real thinking, no long range planning. Just blindly swinging massive fists and hoping to connect.
We accomplished almost nothing in Iraq and next to nothing in Afghanistan at a cost 7,000 dead Americans and at least $2 trillion. For the first time in American history, taxes were not raised to pay for either war. Rather, Bush put his wars on the national credit card.
God forbid the wealthy should be asked to sacrifice even one dollar of their precious earnings.
Meantime, until Obama had the guts to give the politically risky order to kill him, Osama bin Laden was giving the finger to America. Now bin Laden and scores of his lieutenants are burning in hell and al Qaeda is a shell of what it was in 2008.
President Obama is exactly right to call off the dogs of war. It was the wrong answer to the terrorism threat from the get-go. Investigations, surgical strikes, black ops, espionage and all the rest is how you take down vicious international thugs, not sending hundreds of thousands of American troops to Iraq or Afghanistan to "nation build."
(And to my usual critics: No, I didn't serve in uniform. The Vietnam war was over and the draft abolished by the time I graduated from high school. America went to an all-volunteer military and I chose not to enlist. I honor those who do serve and never, ever want to see our young servicemen and women committed to unnecessary wars where they are asked to risk their lives for the sake of some politician's "legacy" or a military contractor's profitability.)
Gov. Nathan Deal wants more minorities to vote Republican because he suddenly realized all those black and Hispanic kids in our public schools will be the majority of the Georgia electorate in one more generation.
So to attract these young African-Americans and Hispanics and their parents to the GOP’s big tent, Deal signed an order last week restricting the Common Core curriculum, not because it’s bad for education, but because its adoption was encouraged by the Obama administration.
It’s the same far right pandering Deal engaged in when he refused Medicaid expansion dollars. That decision cost the state jobs and revenue while ensuring your federal tax dollars pay for expanded Medicaid in blue states New York without a nickel coming back to Georgia.
Sen. Chuck Schumer thanks you.
On the one hand, the GOP knows it will continue to lose elections without African-Americans, Hispanics and Latinos, Asians and other minority constituencies, not to mention women.
On the other hand, as noted by MDJ’s Don McKee, “One hurdle for Deal and other Georgia GOP leaders is the disaffected tea party and other conservatives like those who appeared at the state convention Friday to denounce ‘Republicans in name only.’”
See the problem for the party of stupid, as Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal famously dubbed today’s GOP? They want it both ways.
We’ll let the radicals, the nativists, the religious right, the tin foil hat wearers, and the angry white men run the party - the same crowd that effectively destroyed the GOP’s 2012 presidential chances - but we’d sure like them black folks, Mexicans and ladies to vote for us!
Those RINOs the tea partiers detest are the same moderate Republicans who used to help conservatives win elections; you know, guys like Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan.
But with the far right wingers making noise disproportionate to their actual numbers – only 8 percent of conservatives self-identify as tea party according to Rasmussen – and Republican elected officials terrified of being “primaried” out of a job, the GOP leadership believes, falsely, that their party must accommodate extremism.
Those elusive minority votes won’t come until Republicans purge their ranks of the radical elements that are costing them elections.
Can you imagine the right wing’s reaction to President Barrack Obama donning a flight suit and then landing in a Navy jet on the deck of an aircraft carrier for the purposes of political theater?
That’s what George W. Bush did ten years ago this month, just weeks after he ordered the invasion of Iraq.
These are the kind of teachable moments we, as informed citizens, need to pay attention to. We should not forget or excuse them, but study and learn from them.
Beneath a White House-produced sign declaring “Mission Accomplished,” with the 2004 re-election campaign cameras rolling, Bush announced an “end of major combat operations,” telling Americans ,"In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.”
“…I just died, and I said my God, it's too conclusive,” Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld would later tell Bob Woodward.
In 2009, Bush admitted, "… putting 'Mission Accomplished' on an aircraft carrier was a mistake.”
Major combat operations weren’t over. In fact, things in Iraq were just heating up as Bush was prancing around in his flight suit on the deck of the U.S.S. Lincoln. They would culminate in a decade-long war of choice, a misadventure of historic proportions that cost the lives of 4,500 Americans and more than $1 trillion.
Worse, the Muslim world saw the slaughter of their co-religionists, more than 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, and reacted with outrage and contempt for America.
Bush’s Iraq debacle didn’t keep America safe; it further endangered America, radicalizing even more Muslims like the Boston bombers.
We also know from confirmed extemporaneous accounts that Bush was looking for any excuse to invade Iraq and overthrow its brutal tyrant, Saddam Hussein, perhaps because Saddam plotted to assassinate Bush’s father.
"After all, this is the guy who tried to kill my dad at one time," Bush smirked in 2007.
Other than Bush’s personal vendetta, there was no reason to invade Iraq, yet the administration worked feverishly in the run up to the war to sell Congress and Americans on the supposed threat Saddam posed; WMD “mushroom clouds” and all that B.S.
Anybody looking closely and paying attention at the time – people like Sen. Barrack Obama - knew Saddam was a danger only to the unfortunate people of Iraq, a garden variety dictator, just one of many blood-soaked tyrants around the world.
Question: If America was going to take Saddam out, why not all the others?
Answer: Saddam was the one sitting on one of the largest oil reserves in the world.
Now, the same conservatives who cheered for the Iraq invasion, who promised speedy victory, who said we’d be greeted as liberators, that Iraqi oil would pay for the war are demanding another war of choice, this time in Syria.
Ten years after “Mission Accomplished,” we have another teachable moment for America.
Are you paying attention?
When I saw 13-year-old Jonathan Krohn’s 2009 CPAC speech shortly after Barrack Obama was sworn in, like everyone else, I was struck by the lad’s eloquence.
Most 13-year-old boys would stand up before a crowd of adults, hands in pockets, and self consciously shuffle and mumble. This home schooled Christian kid from Duluth, Georgia was confident and forceful.
I disagreed with everything he said, of course. It sounded a lot like a mindless Limbaugh-Hannity-O’Reilly-Coulter mash-up - which he now admits it was - but Krohn’s performance was nonetheless impressive.
For awhile, Jonathan was the toast of the far right airwaves, cheered as the future of the conservative movement in America. His book, “Define Conservatism,” was a right wing must read.
Then the boy grew up.
“One of the first things that changed was that I stopped being a social conservative,” Krohn said in a recent interview. “It just didn’t seem right to me anymore. From there, it branched into other issues, everything from health care to economic issues...it’s just that I thought about it more. The issues are so complex, you can’t just go with some ideological mantra for each substantive issue.”
Well done young man. You began thinking for yourself. That’s the second step one must take if one hopes to kick conservative addiction. The first step is accepting you have a problem.
“An open mind and critical thought are like a metaphorical AA after a long bender on ideological wine,” Krohn acknowledges. “I’m proud to say that this program has gotten me three years sober.
Addicts often have enablers somewhere behind the scenes.
“I felt justified in my beliefs if for no other reason than no one actually told me I was wrong,” Krohn explained. “Instead, men like Bill Bennett and Newt Gingrich hailed me as the voice for my generation and a hope for America. “
Ah, Bill and Newt, the gambling addict and the serial philanderer; not exactly the best role models there, Jonathan.
As the recovering conservative dirty trickster David Brock says, you were blinded by the right. You were seduced into believing the world is simple; black or white, good or evil, with nothing in between, except that craps table or the comely blonde on your staff.
“The never-ending war between the left and the right seems to me like a couple of drunken college boys fighting over which one of their fraternities is cooler,” Krohn wrote.
As Jonathan now knows, our progressive fraternity is most definitely a lot cooler. George Clooney and Stevie Wonder are members. Over at the conservative frat house you’ll find Jon Voight and Lee Greenwood.
“I was tired of the right using me as an example of how young people ‘get’ what they’re talking about when it’s obvious that I didn’t get what I talking about at all. I mean, come on, I was between 13 and 14 when I was regurgitating these talking points!”
Meantime, Krohn’s recovery has not been welcomed by his old fraternity brothers. They take a very dim view of someone who kicks the habit.
“I have been treated by the political right with all the maturity of schoolyard bullies. The Daily Caller...wrote three articles about my shift, topping it off with an opinion piece in which they stated that I ... wear “thick-rimmed glasses” ... Why don’t they just call me ‘four-eyes’? These are not adults leveling serious criticism; these are scorned right-wingers showing all the maturity of a little boy. No wonder I fit in so well when I was 13.”