Feds Nix Vote Suppression Law in S.C.
by Kevin_Foley
 Politics Progressive
December 29, 2011 02:42 PM | 2389 views | 3 3 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
South Carolina's past came back to haunt the state last week when the Department of Justice rejected its new voter identification law, a tarted-up version of the Jim Crow era poll tax. Because of the state's history of electoral abuses aimed at minorities, South Carolina and many other jurisdictions in the South must have any new voting measures likely to affect minorities approved by the U.S. attorney general or a panel of federal judges under the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Proponents insist such laws are needed to stop voting fraud...except voting fraud is virtually non-existent. After an intense investigation by the Bush Justice Department between 2002 and 2006, the government prosecuted exactly zero voting fraud cases despite 300 million ballots cast during that period.
When I told a conservative friend this, he went off on ACORN, which is also non-existent. "I don't understand why people have a problem getting a photo ID," whined another buddy who's a Tea Partier. Not the point, I patiently explained. In the past, you could show up at the polls with a voter registration card and sign an affidavit. Why, suddenly, is it necessary to obtain a government issued picture ID?
Here's a possible answer: The Justice Department told South Carolina its law was discriminatory because minority voters in the state were 20 percent less likely to have a governnment-issued photo ID.

Let's be honest, shall we? African-Americans generally don't favor Republican policies or candidates. This is reflected in the number of minorities who call themselves Republicans, just 11 percent, according to a 2009 Gallup poll. More telling is that 95 percent of African-American voters went for Barack Obama in 2008.
None of this is lost on the GOP-controlled state legislatures that scurried to pass strict new voter ID laws in the wake of Obama's inauguration. The goal is very simple: Place as many obstacles as possible between voting booths and those likely to cast their ballots for Democrats.
It's not going to stand, as the good folks in the Palmetto State learned.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
January 03, 2012
To say there's no voter fraud is an absolute lie. The Democrats have made voter fraud part and parcel of their tactics, everywhere from the smallest county in S.C. to the largest precinct in Chicago.

And just because congress passed the DEFUND ACORN ACT in 2009, that doesn't mean it's gone. It lives on, with names changed and is even getting funds from the Obama Administration in defiance of the law.

New York Communities for Change has funded the Occupy movement. New England United 4 Justice is another spinoff. According to Andrew Breitbart's Big Government blog, Obama’s Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) gave ACORN $461,086 last January. The funds were earmarked for ACORN Housing Corp. under HUD’s Self-help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), according to the government website USAspending.gov.

The administration isn’t even trying to conceal the fact that it gave this money to ACORN.

USAspending.gov identifies the recipient as “ACORN Housing Corporation Inc.” even though that nonprofit entity filed papers last year legally changing its name to Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA).

The website also provides the address of record for ACORN Housing as 1024 Elysian Fields Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana. That’s the renovated funeral home that until recently served as headquarters for ACORN’s 370-plus shady affiliates.

This means the Obama administration has given at least $540,905 in taxpayer money to ACORN last calendar year alone.

The money was given to ACORN in defiance of Public Law 111-117 which spells out in pretty clear terms that ACORN should not be funded with taxpayer monies.

Now what was that about voter fraud again?

January 02, 2012
If I get on a plane I have to show ID. If I cash a check I have to show ID. Sometimes the clerk at the store wants to look at my ID when I charge a purchase. I see no reason why checking an ID to vote is discriminatory. I'm sure the liberals and Democrats would feel differently if a bunch of dead Republicans changed the results of an election and caused one of their own to lose.
No voter fraud?
December 29, 2011
If South Carolina's new law solely targets minorities with the intent of squashing their votes, why was a similar law requiring voter ID in Indiana upheld by the Supreme Court? Do minorities have more picture IDs there? How long will the South be treated in a different way from the rest of the country? When did the Civil War end? Why is the assumption always one of racism?

Also, are the dead people who didn't have voter ID but who apparently cast ballots in a recent SC election disenfranchised if they aren't able to vote again? Having dead people vote isn't voter fraud? How many black, white, purple people don't have ID cards of some sort anyway? How hard is it to pick one up for free from the DMV if one doesn't drive? How do these people survive in the modern world?

This last question never gets answered by liberals who don't like photo ID cards for voters, which I've never understood. I think this is where a lot of conservatives feel liberals are just crazy, and Southerners feel discriminated against because other states can have these laws to protect their elections, but Southerners cannot.

Anyway, I can't remember the last time I did anything without a photo ID. I was asked for one when I bought a bottle of wine at the store. I had to show one when I cashed my last check. I also had to have one when I voted last.

Somehow, this wasn't difficult for me.

Why is it difficult for anyone else?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides