|January 04, 2013||Questions: Why is Cobb Chairman Tim Lee fighting the effort to insure that taxpayers aren’t payin...||3 comments|
|November 14, 2012||On illegal immigration and a repeat of the 1986 GOP-led amnesty that was to have solved the crisi...||21 comments|
|November 09, 2012||A follow-up on my column||13 comments|
|November 02, 2012||Hope and change, Obama’s illegal aliens move forward by openly working for his re-election||10 comments|
|October 17, 2012||A supplement to my printed MDJ commentary on the Kennesaw State University “ 4th Conference on Im...||22 comments|
|October 02, 2012||A new study on the discredited Southern Poverty Law Center hucksters||36 comments|
|September 05, 2012||Forward! Obama, the food-stamp president, is hawking …food stamps – most illegal alien families a...||50 comments|
|August 29, 2012||More on the hate mongers at the SPLC||36 comments|
|August 21, 2012||Giving race-baiting, parasitic hucksters a bad name: Recommended reading on the Southern Poverty ...||24 comments|
|August 20, 2012||“Reagan/Bush (& Obama) Amnesty Agenda an Economic Catastrophe for Minorities and Legal Immigrants...||4 comments|
UPDATE - 5:00 PM Friday – We just got a call from Cobb Commissioner Bob Ott. He tells me that he has asked that the language of ordinance be changed to actually reflect requirement that Cobb contractors apply for IMAGE certification. Good work sir! Great news and great work commissioner Ott! We don't think Chairman Lee is going to like this!
UPDATE – Below is the language of the ordinance in question and a link to today’s MDJ news coverage on the scam.
“Sec. 2-143. Employment of Unauthorized Aliens Prohibited. It is the policy of Cobb County that unauthorized aliens shall not be employed to perform work on county contracts involving the physical performance of services. Therefore, the County shall not enter into a contract for the physical performance of services within the State of Georgia unless the contractor shall provide evidence on County-provided forms that it and its subcontractors have registered for and are participating in the federal work authorization program as defined by O.C.G.A. § 13-10-90 et seq. to verify information of all newly hired employees.”
13-10-90 is the definitions section for the 2006 state E-Verify law ---The Cobb BOC itself signed a publicly signed their own agreement with ICE on IMAGE certification in May. This ordinance language is an intentional ruse. Anyone slightly familiar with legislation/immigration and employment verification can see what Lee hopes no one will.
If you haven’t, you can read today’s MDJ news report on the matter here. The headline is very wishful thinking.
Let’s let the feds explain the IMAGE job protection program. The below comes from the DHS Immigration and Customs Enforcement Website:
“IMAGE -- Your Workforce Compliance PartnerBecoming an IMAGE (ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers) member is now easier than ever.
Just a last note before the election on how Obama has fulfilled his promise to “fundamentally change America.”
BTW – According to a new report from the Tomas Rivera Policy Institute at the University of Southern California, illegal immigration from that paradise to our south is back on the rise. Imagine that. The president of the United States ignores American law and the American congress in granting amnesty to another group of illegals, promises general amnesty if re-elected and illegal immigration increases! Who would’a thunkit?
AUDIO Update: Added Sept 19, 2012: Hear babbling Ruler Obama boast that he “actually agrees with redistribution…”
A supplement to MDJ commentary: Barack Hussein Obama - the food-stamp president - is hawking that taxpayer provided program on foreign language radio. Don’t miss the Fox News video.
Most illegal alien families use some sort of American welfare program and the myth of “cheap labor” is nonsense. It is really taxpayer subsidized labor. The part about “looking for a better life” is quite true.
Are productive, tax-paying Americans in search of a better life better off now than they were four years ago?